Conditions & Dis-Ease
Free Non Profit Program
Goji, Acai` and More
Healing in Foods "A-Z"
Holistic Health Pet Food
In Loving Memory
NEW Natural Beauty
Pet Food Horrors
Recalls, Alerts And More
Table of Contents
Talking With Tina
Vaccines, Antibiotics, Etc.
The Winner's Page
Barlean's Organic Oils - Flax Oil Or...
Barlean's Organic ...
or Buy New $26.69
Transfer Factor Plus Advanced Immune System Booster - Modulator -
Boost's ANY immune system
437% in only 48 hours!
to contact Web Mistress regarding any broken links or red x pictures.
Click here to
or Call toll Free
8am to 7pm MST Daily.
Friends or Foe In The "War"
Quick Jump Links:
Steroids & Antibiotics -
Rabies vs. Titer
"The first casualty of war is
truth. The second casualty are the innocent"...
"Antibiotics disrupt the normal population of beneficial
microbes/bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of all Human/animals. These
beneficial bacteria are the first fine of defense against most diseases,
without them the Human/animal is more susceptible to other infections.
Antibiotics depress the immune
system by decreasing the number of circulating white blood cells. This
lowers the Human/animal's ability to fight infections. Some antibiotics,
such as chloramphenicol, can cause irreversible damage to the bone marrow.
Many bacteria develop resistance to the effects of antibiotics. This
resistance can be passed to other bacteria, The concern is that if humans
are exposed to resistant bacteria then the use of antibiotics may be
ineffective in treating any resulting disease.” -
Richard J. Holliday, DVM
Ten Facts Everyone
Should Know About Vaccines
Here are ten basic facts about vaccination that most
people don't know but should know:
1. Vaccines cause brain damage - and can kill. Since the 1970s the British
Government has very quietly handed out tens of thousands of pounds to parents of
children suffering from brain damage caused by vaccines. If you inject
potentially toxic substances into small children you will get problems. The
Government secretly admits this.
2. The number of vaccines is rising rapidly. American children now receive
around 30 vaccinations before they go to school. Today there are vaccines
against all sorts of non-deadly diseases such as mumps and measles which were
traditionally regarded as inconvenient. When a vaccine is introduced a disease
stops being a minor childhood disease and officially becomes a serious killer.
The authorities issue scare warnings in order to frighten people into having the
jab. The number of children diagnosed as suffering from autism has rocketed just
as the number of children being vaccinated has risen. This isn't just true of
the UK, its true of all countries where children are vaccinated. Autism is a
disorder which involves brain damage. And remember no 1 on my list of facts:
vaccines cause brain damage. Now, here's the killer fact: when a research
project was set up to establish a link between vaccination and autism, drug
companies applied to a court for an injunction to stop the research. Now, why
would they do that? And vaccines don't seem to cause only autism. It now seems
possible that vaccinations may cause diseases such as arthritis, eczema and
irritable bowel syndrome - because of their interfering with the immune system.
It's difficult to get research done on these because most research is paid for
by drug companies and the government and neither want to pay for this type of
3. Doctors and drug companies make large amounts of money from vaccines. GPs get
bonuses if they can force enough of their patients to have vaccinations. It is
not unknown for doctors to throw patients off their list because they won't
accept vaccinations - because this affects the GP's earnings.
4. No one knows which vaccines interact badly. No one knows what effect all
these vaccines have on the immune system. No one knows how safe they are. They
don't know because no one has ever tried to find out. What is beyond dispute is
that vaccines can and do kill people. One anti-flu vaccine which was given to
over a million Americans contained a monkey virus which causes cancer.
5. Many of the diseases which we are told have been extinct by vaccines were
disappearing or controlled long before the vaccines were introduced. For
example, the number of deaths from polio fell before the first polio vaccination
was introduced. Look at the figures and you'll see that the incidence of polio
went up after the vaccine was introduced. In Tennessee the number of children
who got polio before vaccination was introduced was 119. The year after
vaccination was introduced it was 386. Traditionally, deaths from whooping cough
occur among very young babies - who are too young to have the vaccine anyway.
6. Vaccines are developed using material taken from animals. Tissues include
brain tissue from rabbits, kidney tissue from dogs and monkeys, blood from pigs,
protein from hens eggs. This can be dangerous because cell cultures may be and
sometimes are contaminated. During the 1990s children received vaccinations
prepared using material which could have been infected with BSE. The British
Government was warned of the hazard. We won't know whether this is serious or
not for another decade. Some vaccines are made with aborted human foetal tissue.
No one knows what diseases might be in that tissue.
7. Many vaccines contain thimerosal which contains mercury. Mercury is one of
the most toxic substances known to man. The World Health Organisation says there
is no safe level for mercury in the human body.
8. Between 20% and 50% of people who are vaccinated don't get a resistance to
the disease against which they have been immunised. So they are put at risk to
9. Epidemics of foot and mouth disease always start in countries where
vaccination against foot and mouth is compulsory. The evidence suggests that the
rabies vaccine is keeping rabies alive.
10. Vaccines are now compulsory in some countries - eg America. This week I
received an e-mail from the Czech republic asking for permission to translate
material on vaccines from my website - where incidentally all the information is
free and there are no ads - because, I'm told, vaccination is now compulsory
there and there is no anti-vaccination material available. Governments are
enthusiastic about vaccines because they believe that vaccinations help stop the
spread of diseases in a community and therefore save money. When kids have
measles their mums stay off work. That costs the economy money. Vaccines are
given to minimise disruption and to save money. If your child is vaccinated then
you are allowing the government to use your child to protect the economy by
reducing the incidence of disease in the community. Child A is vaccinated to
stop child B or C getting the disease and to stop the parents of B or C having
time off work. The authorities are now even talking of giving the rubella
vaccine to young boys to help cut the incidence of that disease among pregnant
Remember, if these facts weren't true I would either be sued or struck off the
medical register. Remember, too, that over the last 40 years I've made a lot of
enemies who would be only too happy to report me - and, indeed, who do so
frequently in vain attempts to stop me telling the truth. And remember that I
have no vested interests. I don't represent anyone. If I thought vaccines were
marvellous I would say so and attack the people trying to oppose their use. My
only interest is the truth. My concern is that I believe that the amount of
illness and the number of deaths caused by vaccinations far exceeds the amount
of illness and the number of deaths which vaccinations might prevent. The
information on my website is all available free of charge and I don't accept
advertisements or sponsors for any of my books.
What to do if you or your child is having a vaccination:
1. If your doctor wants to vaccinate you, ask him to confirm in writing that the
vaccine is both essential and safe and that the person having the vaccination is
healthy enough to receive it. And get the doctor to tell you the batch number of
the vaccine. You will probably notice his enthusiasm disappear.
2. If you do have a vaccination keep the name of the doctor, the date and time
and batch number safely. Lawsuits against doctors, drug companies and the
government usually fail because people don't have this information.
3. I believe that if children scream or show unusual signs after a vaccination
then there is a real chance that they will develop autism. Sadly, its too late
to do anything about it then. But videotape children before and after
vaccination and you will be better placed to sue for damages.
Copyright Vernon Coleman November 1st 2006
There is more information about vaccines in Dr Vernon Coleman's books
Coleman's Laws</> and Superbody - available from the shop
on this website and from all good bookshops and libraries everywhere.
You Need To Know Before You Vaccinate !
"You can’t make an animal
MORE immune to a disease by vaccinating them over and over- no matter what a Vet
By Ed Frawley
REPORT ANY REACTION YOUR PET HAS TO
Medication to the FDA
The unfortunate thing about
Vaccinosis is that people don't get involved in learning about it until after
there is a problem, and by then its often too late.
Vaccinosis is the term used for
"reactions our pets have to being vaccinated". It is far more common than we are
lead to believe. In fact most veterinarians refuse to talk about it because they
are the ones who give the shots that cause Vaccinosis.
Over the past servable years I have
started to seriously question what the Veterinary industry recommends for a
regimes of yearly vaccinations on our dogs. I will tell you that I no longer
vaccinate my dogs every year. I strongly recommend that you research this issue
and not blindly accept the advice of your local vet, no matter how nice of a
person he or she is.
It is my opinion after the
initial puppy vaccinations additional vaccinations often cause more problems
than they cure. My research indicates that side effects from yearly vaccinations
are thyroid problems, epilepsy, cancer, allergies and behavioral problems just
to mention a few. I would recommend that you do your own research. Go to Google
and search on "Vaccinosis". Ask yourself if you honestly think the veterinary
medical industry is that far behind the human medical field. Humans do not need
yearly vaccinations and I do not think our dogs need yearly vaccinations. There
is an excellent book out entitled
Shock to the
System. If you want to have your eyes
opened, read this book.
Dangers of Vaccination
By Dr. Jeffrey
Levy, DVM PCH
purpose of vaccination is to protect your pet from potentially fatal infections
by pathogenic (disease-causing) viruses such as distemper, rabies, and others.
The way this is done is to inject either a killed virus or a 'modified'
(non-pathogenic) live virus, which sensitizes the immune system to that
particular virus. Thereafter, if your dog is exposed to, let's say, parvovirus,
s/he will be able to respond quickly and vigorously, producing antibodies to
overcome the infection.
sounds like a pretty good plan, on the surface. However, as with any medical
procedure, we must ask the simple and direct questions, Is it safe? Is it
effective? Do the benefits outweigh the risks?
Problems with Vaccination
'Routine' vaccination, as it is practiced today, is not always effective
(especially in the case of the feline leukemia vaccine), and frequently has
adverse side effects, either short term or long term. With the use of
multivalent (combination: 3-in-1, 6-in-1, etc.) vaccines that are repeated year
after year, the frequency and severity of these side effects in our pets has
surprisingly, most of the problems involve the immune system. After all, the
immune system is what vaccines are designed to stimulate. But they do so in a
very unnatural way that can overwhelm and confuse the immune system. The body
may overreact to normally harmless substances (allergies, especially flea
allergies and other skin problems), or even produce antibodies to itself
same time, the body may be sluggish in responding to those things that it should
reject, such as common viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites. This can result
in increased susceptibility to acute infections (such as parvovirus), chronic or
recurring infections (such as ear infections in dogs, bladder infections or
feline leukemia in cats), or other chronic problems such as arthritis, kidney
disease, or even cancer.
summary, there is a great deal of evidence implicating vaccination as the cause
of many serious chronic health problems. For this reason, I do not recommend
vaccination for dogs or cats.
particular, I strongly recommend against vaccination for Feline Leukemia in
cats, because (a) it is not very effective, and (b) I have found that vaccinated
cats that subsequently contract the virus are much more likely to die from it. I
also recommend against vaccination for Lyme disease and kennel cough in dogs,
again due to lack of effectiveness, and the fact that these conditions are
generally not very serious. As such, the potential harm of the vaccine is not
fairness, the choice to forgo vaccination for your pets does carry some risk.
Your puppy could contract parvovirus, for instance, which that particular
vaccine is effective in preventing. Fortunately, parvo is generally quite easy
to treat homeopathically. Distemper and infectious hepatitis are rarely seen
Unfortunately, the law now requires rabies vaccination for dogs and cats. This
is for reasons of potential human exposure, not for the health of your pet.
should know, however, that all vaccines, including rabies, are medically
approved for use in healthy animals only. This is explicitly stated in the
package insert for every vaccine. So if your dog or cat is showing any signs of
acute or chronic disease, the manufacturers do not recommend administration of
for some good news, rabies titers are being increasingly used to demonstrate
effective immunity and avoid unnecessary revaccination.
vaccination should be followed immediately by a single dose of the Lyssin 30C,
which is the rabies nosode. This should help to minimize the harmful effects of
the vaccine. However, if you see any symptoms or reaction to the rabies
vaccination, you should consult a veterinary homeopath for treatment
Treatment with allopathic drugs (antibiotics, steroids, hormones, etc.) should
be avoided unless absolutely necessary. The need for drug treatment is actually
quite unusual, and should be considered a last resort. Antibiotics are often
completely superfluous, such as in treating abscesses or viral infections. They
should also not be used routinely to prevent infection, such as after most
surgery or dental procedures. For most situations in which antibiotics are
given, there are safe, effective alternatives.
Corticosteroids (cortisone-type anti-inflammatory drugs) are the most abused and
dangerous class of drugs. Not only do they not cure the underlying cause of the
problem, they usually make the underlying problem, that is, the real problem,
greatest harm of drug treatment is usually not so much the toxicity or side
effects as it is the effects of suppression. Allopathic (conventional Western)
medical thinking generally seeks immediate gratification: just make the symptom
go away. So the patient may be better in the short term, but is usually worse in
the longer term. Homeopathy is just the opposite: sometimes the symptoms are
worse in the short term (such as with aggravation or the reversal of a previous
suppression), but the real benefit is in the longer term.
symptom, say itchy skin, is the body's response to a deeper problem. When a
symptom is suppressed, it is only the outward manifestation of the problem that
goes away. Since the deeper problem is still there, the body may, in time,
produce the same symptom again. Another possibility is that, as a result of the
suppression, the deeper problem progresses to the point that a deeper, more
serious symptom is produced. So the itchy skin may go away, but then chronic
diarrhea develops. If the diarrhea is then suppressed as well, it may lead to,
say, liver disease. But hey, at least the skin is cleared up!
this pattern, or variations on it, very frequently in reviewing the medical
records of new patients. It is the unrecognized, and often high, price that we
pay for the quick fix, for immediate gratification, for the shot or pill that
seems to make the problem go away.
Doctor Levy is a Classical
Veterinary Homeopath located in Williamsburg, MA. 01096 Phone (413)
Jon Rappoport's "Interview
of An Ex-Vaccine Researcher"
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems,
when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under
surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make
specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate
justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so
that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the
atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by
honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be
investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses
was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of
developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.
Q: And then?
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: What conclusions did you come to?
A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.
Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease
in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't
contract the diseases as easily.
Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?
A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.
Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more
dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all
vaccines are dangerous.
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends
to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to
prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been
tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine
suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the
vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune
system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact
is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.
Q: Which is?
A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get
smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced
smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine
Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.
A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked
up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the
cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the
time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.
Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.
A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the
polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm
talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The
careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I
would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing
process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't
know are in those kidneys.
Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of
contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of
work with vaccines?
A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you
what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles
vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found
acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.
Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in
the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various
micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme
inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella
vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in
A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can
cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very
little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most
people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep
A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have
found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines
from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look
for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling.
You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I
have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also
human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could
mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the
bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you
use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters
in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde,
mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows
how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look
for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many
possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea.We have no idea what they
might be, or what effects they could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they
intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity
from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is
supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against
disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than
antibodies and their related "killer cells."
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might
say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals
who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important.
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received
the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver
disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the
diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that
people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed
to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's
circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault.
If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some
other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the
Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you
encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But
they would never go public, even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the
vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started
my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot
from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case
in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over
time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought,
vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term
follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is
made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of
that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur
very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn't it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time
after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual.
Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even
according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with
vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the
case with a vaccine which contains mercury?
Q: And that is what you found?
A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not
perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological
damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be
sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.
Q: Has it been enough?
A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.
Q: Which is?
A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at
the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate,
they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This
vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on
definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the
Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people
have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored.
It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just
an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if
you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you
realize that these are NOT isolated situations.
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when
you were still working in the vaccine establishment?
A: Yes I did.
Q: What happened?
A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go
back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear.
Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by
association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create
problems for myself.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult
question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no
harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but
isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart,
which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter.
This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for
two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different
layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the
desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism,
unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel,
vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system.
I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the
highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken
them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a
man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me
that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these
depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made
up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor.
This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been
used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for
takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several
of these people from this network.
Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but
he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a
hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system.
He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he
will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS
Q: This network you speak of.
A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question
is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is
a difficult issue.
Q: And in the industrialized nations?
A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because
people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the
right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming
mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is
an important time.
Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.
A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the
next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared
needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover
themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year
from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I
dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.
Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR
vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.
A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the
vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is
involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has
not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press
interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive
questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife
has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is
sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their
children were severely damaged by the MMR.
Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.
A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to
keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her
promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband.
At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act.
It is thought of as a matter of national security.
Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.
A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously
guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level
as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist
in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a
vaccine is committing career suicide.
A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several
reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge
amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your
demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke
against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who
has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.
Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic
frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is
challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that
money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends
on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every
frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole
enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should
think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five
thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits
of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been
conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that
facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with
further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might
start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow.
People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people.
Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to
babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which
have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe,
and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the
truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when
you give many of them in a short time period.
Q: Then we have the fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia.
The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If
it happens in October, it is the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?
A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in
other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use
Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?
A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines
is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The
burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed
long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers
and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to
them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not
Q: The things that are not there.
Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease
problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the
person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine
is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the
vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later
time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused
by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it
could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.
Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a
population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many
get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is
a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And
with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most
of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine
campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very
disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep
and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been
led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about
autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at
meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by
the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that
child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by
his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health
status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches
five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?
A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better
health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is
nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child
might get. I would bet on the first child every time.
Q: How long did you work with vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are
A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is
vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the
family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to
that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act.
There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or
philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be
A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus
on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time?
What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental
faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one
cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And
frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word.
Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You
get one or the other, but not both.
Q: So we come to the level playing field.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to
decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if
the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents
making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about
the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his
parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents
with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad
parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to
buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every
person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet.
It is betting that the fear will win.
Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher
who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US
government's National Institutes of Health.
Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he
discovered about vaccines."
As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an
attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and
efficacy of vaccines.
Mark has been one of my sources.
He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but
with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like
quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.
He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he
has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the
scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and
general debilitation of populations.
Click here for more from JON RAPPOPORT
MMR was introduced across the UK in 1988 but claims in
1998 that the vaccine might be linked to autism provoked widespread alarm.
Researchers looked at the vaccination records for Scotland for all children
born between 1987 and 2004 and the impact of adverse publicity surrounding
Full Story @
Published: 2006/04/24 23:24:08 GMT
© BBC MMVI
Parent to Parent
Vaccine Danger Alert
Did You KNOW … that during the last session of the
US Congress, the pharmaceutical industry assigned to each member of the
House and Senate six lobbyists each to provide campaign support and
contributions in exchange for congressional votes on legislation that
grants liability protection to the drug companies for injuries,
disabilities, and deaths caused by all vaccines?
All vaccines contain toxic chemicals, DNA from
animal tissue & aborted fetuses, and foreign proteins in the form of
either live or dead viruses and bacteria. Current vaccine technology is
based on science that is over two hundred years old and which says that
vaccines “safely stimulate an immune response”.
Advanced Science states that this is IMPOSSIBLE !
The most advanced science on the human immune
system, developed over the past 100 years in the field of tissue and
organ transplant, proves that the human immune system cannot be tricked,
suppressed, or controlled into accepting or tolerating any foreign DNA
or proteins. The human immune response to the recognition of any foreign
tissue or substance (by infection, injection, or transplantation) always
involves a KILLER reaction upon the foreign invader.
The Dangers of Vaccination
Toxic chemicals added to vaccines create
immunologic as well as nervous system problems because they are not
easily eliminated from the body, they accumulate in brain and organ
tissues, and they damage nerves. Foreign proteins and DNA, when not
adequately neutralized and eliminated by the immune system, can
penetrate through cellular membranes.
Once inside the cells, the foreign DNA bonds to or replaces entire
segments of your own DNA, after which the immune system no longer
recognizes as “self”. When healthy cells mutate into “non-self” cells,
they become targets for the killer immune response.
Killer Immune Responses = Autoimmune Reactions
The immune system correctly
identifies mutated cells, foreign proteins, and toxic chemicals that get
“inside the body” as invaders that must be killed. The killer immune
response to mutated “self” cells is called an autoimmune response.
Because MUTATED CELLS replicate billions of times as replacement cells
for what had been normal cells, a sustained autoimmune response becomes
inevitable and leads to the autoimmune diseases and symptoms listed on
Why is this allowed to continue?
Vaccination, the public health
achievement of the 20th century, is based on a flawed but pervasive
belief that presumes immune function can be improved by injecting toxic
chemicals and foreign proteins into the body. Yet modern science has
proven that this medical procedure cannot be done without serious
Why DO medical doctors and government agencies insist that
vaccines continue to be mandated for our children?
Did You KNOW …The
pharmaceutical industry makes over 7 billion dollars each year from
vaccines. Over 200 new vaccines are being developed and many will to be
added to the childhood vaccination list for guaranteed profits in the
trillions of dollars.
Did You KNOW … The
pharmaceutical industry and medical professions make trillions of
dollars in profit each year from drugs and medical treatment related to
the diseases and conditions that result from autoimmune responses to
Did You KNOW … The only
person that will protect you and your child from the government’s
continued use of outdated and dangerous vaccine technology is YOU!
Diseases & Symptoms Linked to Vaccines
Multiple Sclerosis - MS
Nervous system disorders
Chronic Fatigue CFIDS
Gulf War Syndrome
Convulsions ? Seizures
Shaken Baby Syndrome
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Brain damage (severe)
Foot &Mouth Disease
Promote Vaccine Awareness and Informed Consent Rights
Current vaccine technology and advanced
research in immunology are at odds with each other. Vaccine policy is
reckless and irresponsible. Autoimmune diseases are rising at epidemic
rates in our children. The costs to society for a public health system
that creates chronic illnesses and debility in young and old alike by
vaccination will contribute to a catastrophic health care crisis in the
years to come.
What Can You
- Call for a moratorium on mandated
- Insist on Informed Consent Rights and
Freedom in Health Care Choices
- Demand that the pharmaceutical industry
replace out-dated vaccine technology with safer individualized immune
- Demand accountability from the vaccine
industry and government agencies that make, approve and mandate
vaccines for consumption
- Demand that parents wrongfully convicted &
imprisoned for SBS be released and their cases reviewed
- Know your state’s vaccine statutes regarding
mandates and exemptions
- Educate before your vaccinate – what you
don’t know about vaccination may hurt you or your child!
- Promote awareness of vaccine issues
Vaccine Awareness of Florida
K.N.O.W. Vaccines (Kids Need Options With Vaccines)
Annual Rabies Vaccine or the Titer Test?
“Consumers who do care about managing the effectiveness of their dog’s immune
system against the most dangerous canine viral diseases now have the means to do
so without risking their dog’s health in the process. When you and your dog
visit your veterinarian for an annual checkup, take the titer test”...
Testing a dog’s serum antibody titers can prevent over vaccinating
by Lorie Long from
Whole Dog Journal~
blood for an annual titer test, to check a dog’s level of immune defenses,
should replace the habit of vaccinating dogs annually whether or not they need
Few issues in veterinary medicine are as controversial as the debate about
administering annual vaccinations to our dogs. Long considered part of the
standard of baseline, responsible veterinary healthcare, and credited with
conquering some of the fiercest canine viral and other infectious diseases,
vaccinations now are also suspected of creating vulnerability to illnesses and
chronic conditions such as anemia, arthritis, seizures, allergies,
gastrointestinal and thyroid disorders, and cancer. As we’ve previously
discussed in numerous articles, few people advocate refraining from the use of
vaccinations altogether, but increasing numbers of veterinary experts recommend
administering fewer vaccines to our dogs than was suggested in recent years. The
current wisdom is to vaccinate our animal companions enough, but not too much.
Does this seem a little arbitrary? It could, especially since the veterinary
profession lacks complete information about exactly how long the effects of
canine vaccines last. (We bet you thought that most vaccines “last” about a
year, which is why you are supposed to bring your dog to the vet for more shots
every year, right? Well, you’re wrong, and we’ll explain why below.)
Fortunately, there is a tool that veterinarians and dog owners can use to
determine whether or not a dog really needs further vaccination at any given
time. It’s called a “titer test,” and it’s readily available, not terribly
expensive, and offers multiple advantages over the practices (intentional or
not) of over-vaccination and under-vaccination. To understand what a titer test
is and what it can do for you and your dog, you need a little background
information about vaccinations and their use in this country.
“recommended vaccine schedules”
As lifesaving vaccines for various canine diseases have been developed over the
last 50 years, veterinarians and dog owners gladly embraced them. Many diseases
were prevented, and a new industry was born. Like any industry, it soon set
about making itself indispensable. Increasingly, veterinarians were sold on the
concept that if some vaccines are good, more are better – for their patients and
their bottom line. So it came to pass that for decades, vets followed the label
recommendations directing that canine vaccines be administered annually. In the
late 1970s, a deadly parvovirus epidemic killed thousands of dogs and wiped out
whole litters of puppies, eventually halted by the mass administration of the
parvovirus vaccine. This episode emphasized the important role of vaccinations
in canine healthcare and labeled veterinarians who challenged the annual
administration of vaccines as mutinous. And there was, in fact, a small
population of insurgent veterinarians who had doubts about the necessity of
frequent vaccination. Many holistic practitioners – who often see patients with
complex, mystifying symptoms of poor health, patients who have not been helped
or even diagnosed by conventionally trained veterinarians – suspected a link
between vaccines and immune disorders. In their minds, it was easy to surmise
that there might be a connection between agents that are designed to provoke an
immune response and their patients’ poor or inappropriate immune responses. But
while drug companies are motivated to fund studies that can develop more
vaccines they can sell for a profit, they are understandably disinclined to
spend money on studies that may discover their products’ potential for harm, or
how few vaccines our companion animals really need for disease protection. As a
result, only anecdotal evidence provided by “vaccine rebels” – owners and
veterinarians who either do not vaccinate or vaccinate on a reduced schedule –
seemed to suggest that dogs and cats might be better off receiving fewer
vaccines. But until recently there was little scientific evidence that supported
this idea, perhaps none that was accepted in the conventional university
veterinarian research community. Then, in the early 1990s, laboratory
researchers at the University of Pennsylvania noticed a connection between the
marked increase in the number of sarcomas, or cancerous tumors, under the skin
at the site of rabies vaccine administration in cats. Later, researchers at the University of California
at Davis noted that feline leukemia vaccines seemed to cause the same results.
Taken aback by the inflammatory nature of the animals’ reaction to the vaccines,
veterinary researchers began to suspect that immediate reactions to
vaccinations, delayed reactions to vaccinations, or the combined effects of
multiple vaccinations, could be risk factors for other ailments and chronic
diseases in cats and dogs. As vaccines and their long-term effects became a (at
least minor) topic of mainstream veterinary interest, one small but important
fact came to light: there is no universally accepted “standard vaccination
protocol” that has the approval of say, the American Veterinary Medical
Association and/or the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine. The prevailing
vaccination recommendations and schedules that most veterinarians and veterinary
colleges recommend have been based on the research and suggestions of the
manufacturers – not on independent scientific research. This point had long been
recognized by the vaccine rebels, but disregarded by most conventional
Why more is not
Jean Dodds, DVM, a highly respected veterinary hematologist, and founder and
president of the nonprofit Hemopet, a California-based animal blood bank,
pioneered the vaccine debate decades ago and is now considered one of the
leading authorities on canine vaccine protocols. According to Dr. Dodds, many
recent studies confirm that the vast majority of dogs, in most cases at least 95
percent of the subjects, retain immunity after vaccination for many years after
the administration of a vaccine. She states that the “evidence implicating
vaccines in triggering immune-mediated and other chronic disorders (vaccinosis)
is compelling.” Adverse reactions to conventional vaccines can be the same as
reactions to any chemicals, drugs, or infectious agents. Immediate (or
anaphylactic) reactions can occur in the 24-48 hours following exposure to the
vaccine. Delayed reactions can occur 10-45 days after receiving vaccines.
Symptoms include fever, stiffness, sore joints, abdominal tenderness, nervous
system disorders, susceptibility to infections, and hemorrhages or bruising.
Transient seizures can appear in puppies and adults. More long-term harmful
effects can result in permanent damage to the dog’s immune system, which
increases the dog’s susceptibility to chronic, debilitating diseases affecting
the blood, endocrine organs, joints, skin, central nervous system, liver,
kidneys, and bowel. In addition, vaccines can overwhelm a chronically ill dog,
or a dog that has a genetic predisposition to react adversely to viral exposure,
even from the modified live viral agents or killed virus in vaccines. So, given
the possible health risks of administering too many vaccines, especially when a
dog likely retains the immunologic protection supplied by previous vaccinations,
how can a responsible dog owner decide on a safe and effective vaccine schedule
for the life of their dog? As we suggested earlier, the answer is titer tests.
Understanding titer tests
The term “titer” refers to the strength or concentration of a substance in a
solution. When testing vaccine titers in dogs, a veterinarian takes a blood
sample from a dog and has the blood tested for the presence and strength of the
dog’s immunological response to a viral disease. If the dog demonstrates
satisfactory levels of vaccine titers, the dog is considered sufficiently immune
to the disease, or possessing good “immunologic memory,” and not in need of
further vaccination against the disease at that time.
the new TiterCHEKTM test kit, your veterinarian can now draw blood from your dog
when you first arrive for his annual health exam, and within 15 minutes, be able
to tell you whether or not he needs any vaccines.
tests do not distinguish between the immunity generated by vaccination and that
generated by natural exposure to disease agents. A dog may have developed
immunity to a viral disease by receiving a vaccine against the disease, by being
exposed to the disease in the natural environment and conquering it, sometimes
without having demonstrated any symptoms of exposure to the disease, or by a
combination of the two. Therefore, titer tests really measure both the “priming
of the pump” that comes from vaccines, and the immunity resulting from natural
exposure to disease during a dog’s lifetime. Only an indoor dog that has been
totally sequestered from the natural environment is likely to have developed all
of its immunity from vaccinations. Although the magnitude of immunity protection
received by vaccination only is usually lower than by vaccination plus exposure,
it doesn’t matter how your dog developed its strong immunity to specific viral
diseases, as long as the immunity is present. By “titering” annually, a dog
owner can assess whether her dog’s immune response has fallen below adequate
levels. In that event, an appropriate vaccine booster can be administered.
Which titers tests?
Some dog owners, aware that there are dozens of vaccines available, are
concerned that they would need to order titer tests for each vaccine. Actually,
measuring the titers for just two vaccines, according to Dr. Dodds, can offer
the dog owner a reliable “picture” of the dog’s immunological status. Good
immunity to canine parvovirus (CPV) and canine distemper virus (CDV), she says,
indicates proper “markers for the competence of the dog’s immune system.”
Although the laboratories will also perform vaccine titer tests for other canine
diseases, such as coronavirus and Lyme, Dr. Dodds deems these tests a waste of
money. Protection from coronavirus, Dr. Dodds explains, depends on the current
state of health of the dog’s gastrointestinal tract, not on what’s in the dog’s
blood, so serum tests are not conclusive. Lyme is regionally based and not a
significant threat to the general canine population, so only dogs in a high-risk
environment need titer testing for Lyme. Dr. Dodds emphasizes that titer testing
is not a “guess” at immunological response in a dog; when dealing with CDV and
CDP, there is absolute correlation between certain high titer values and what is
frequently referred to as “protection” from the diseases in question. In this
case, the animal’s owner and veterinarian can feel quite confident that the
animal possesses sufficient resources for fighting off a disease challenge. When
the tests reveal that the animal has borderline or low titer values, the owner
and veterinarian should consider revaccinating and then testing the titers
again. It may turn out that the animal simply needed a booster to stimulate a
stronger immune response. Or, maybe the people involved learn that the animal
lacks the ability to respond normally to vaccines, that is, by mounting a proper
immune response. In this case, the owner and veterinarian have gained very
valuable information about the dog’s compromised immune status – information
they never would have gained by simply vaccinating and assuming the dog was
“protected” as is usually the case with healthy dogs. As you can see, in
reality, simply administering vaccines to dogs every year is more of a guessing
game than using titer tests to learn about the dog’s immune competence. Studies
worldwide support titer test results as comprehensive information about a dog’s
immunological response capabilities.
Now more affordable
Because the more widely recognized benefits of titer testing have caused an
increase in the number of titer tests performed at veterinary laboratories, the
price is coming down and the tests are available from a wide range of providers.
Veterinary laboratories offer traditional vaccine titer testing by looking at a
blood sample from a dog and identifying a specific level of actual immunity in
the dog. Reputable laboratories use commonly accepted immunological techniques
that have been validated against original test techniques and found to be
accurate. Be certain your veterinarian sends blood samples to a major
professional veterinary laboratory such as Antech Diagnostics (www.antechdiagnostics.com),
Idexx Laboratories (www.idexx.com), Vita-Tech Laboratories (www.vita-tech.com),
or one of the major university veterinary laboratories, including Cornell,
Colorado State, Michigan State, Tufts, and Texas A&M. In early spring 2002,
Synbiotics Corporation, a San Diego-based manufacturer of diagnostic materials
and instrumentation for the veterinary market, rolled out an innovative tool
that should make titer testing even more readily available and affordable.
TiterCHEKTM is the first in-office titer test licensed by the USDA for use in
veterinary clinics. TiterCHEKTM tests titers for canine parvovirus and canine
distemper virus, registering the degree of strength of the immune response in
varying color shades. If the test results denote a weak immune response level,
blood samples can be sent to a veterinary laboratory for more comprehensive
testing. Dr. Dodds estimates that more than 95 percent of in-office tests will
indicate a satisfactory immune response present in a dog that has received its
puppy vaccinations and one-year boosters, so follow-up is rarely required.
Expect to pay your veterinarian from $40 to $100 for CDV and CPV titer testing
from a laboratory, and slightly less for an in-office test, for which your
veterinarian must purchase the TiterCHEKTM test kit.
Why Are Many
Veterinarians Are Resisting Vaccine
As practicing clinicians, veterinarians are hesitant to adjust any clinical
regimen they have adopted until they see research study data that they judge
to be functional and applicable in the real world. Many veterinarians resisted
rethinking the annual canine vaccine regimen based upon the early findings of
researchers. However, the increased evidence linking over-vaccination to acute
and chronic diseases in dogs has finally caused a mainstream conviction that
vaccination protocols are not a one-size-fits-all healthcare decision. Indeed,
Dr. Dodds, once considered a rebel by the veterinary profession, now speaks to
standing-room-only audiences at the most prestigious professional conferences
in the country. The perceived need for annual vaccinations used to motivate
many dog owners to make appointments with their veterinarians for their dog’s
annual wellness checkup. Veterinarians now hope that annual titer tests will
perform a similar function. Having your dog examined by a veterinarian at
least once a year is critically important for detecting, preventing, and
treating any diseases or other ailments as early as possible. Adding the
ability to check your dog’s immunological health and custom-tailor his vaccine
schedule to his actual needs will impressively augment this important task. It
has been estimated that only about 60 percent of pet dogs receive the minimum
disease prevention vaccination protocol. Ironically, in an attempt to provide
their beloved animal companions with the best possible care, many highly
motivated owners arrange for their dogs to receive several times the necessary
dose of vaccinations, to the point of risking the adverse effects of
over-vaccination on the health of the dog’s immune system. Consumers who do
care about managing the effectiveness of their dog’s immune system against the
most dangerous canine viral diseases now have the means to do so without
risking their dog’s health in the process. When you and your dog visit your
veterinarian for an annual checkup, take the titer test.
Long is a frequent contributor to WDJ. She lives in North Carolina with two
Border Terriers, Dash (a three-year-old female and agility queen) and Chase (a
five-month-old male with an agility future).
Copyright 2002 Whole Dog Journal. For subscription and other information, call
New “Monster” strains of Virus’
and Bacteria are being discovered, which are not responding to antibiotics.
That’s why it’s IMPERATIVE to build up strong Immune Systems. It’s
up to YOU to empower your body with what it needs to fight off these
dangerous microbes. Don’t wait until you, your family and/or pet's are faced with illness or poor
health, I implore you!
Toll Free 1-888-213-8593
8am to 7pm MST Daily
BUILD A "HEALTHY" IMMUNE SYSTEM,
AND DETOXIFY YOUR BODY DAILY!
That Legal, F.D.A Stuff:
You should always consult with a healthcare
professional before taking any dietary, nutritional, herbal or homeopathic
supplement. All information contained on this web site is for informational
purposes only. The United States Food and Drug Administration has not evaluated
the statements made on this web site. Therefore, the information provided on
this web site is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any condition
or disease and should not be used as a substitute for your own Health Care